Resolving execution of judgment in Indonesia investment fraud case to ensure asset recovery for victims
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47741/17943108.663Palabras clave:
Recuperación de activos, ejecución, fraude en inversionesResumen
En respuesta al fraude de inversiones, el sistema de justicia penal debe situar a la víctima en el centro, teniendo en cuenta su pérdida financiera. Indonesia ha respondido estableciendo la recuperación de activos para las víctimas; sin embargo, hay signos de estancamiento en su ejecución. Este estudio pretende explicar las causas y soluciones de dicho estancamiento para que las víctimas puedan beneficiarse del sistema judicial. Este estudio utiliza un enfoque casuístico y estatutario para analizar el funcionamiento de las disposiciones de ejecución en materia de recuperación de activos. Se seleccionó un caso en la ciudad de Cirebon (provincia de Java Occidental) porque la ejecución no se ha completado a pesar de haberse iniciado desde 2017 para evitar fallos similares, ya que los tribunales indonesios tienden ahora a favorecer la recuperación de activos. Los datos primarios se obtuvieron a partir de entrevistas con funcionarios directamente implicados en la ejecución del caso, complementados con datos secundarios obtenidos mediante análisis normativo y un estudio bibliográfico. Este artículo revela los graves problemas en la liquidación de activos a los que se enfrentan los organismos de ejecución, ya que los autores han cumplido sus penas de prisión, aunque las víctimas aún no han recibido sus derechos. El estancamiento prolongado ha llevado a la percepción de que el acceso a la recuperación de activos no es ejecutable. Este estudio ofrece una solución para sincronizar las normativas y potenciar de forma más óptima los recursos del sistema de justicia penal.
Descargas
Referencias
Akers, M. D., & Gissel, J. L. (2006). What Is Fraud and Who Is Responsible? Journal of Forensic Accounting Profession, 7(1), 247-256. https://core.ac.uk/download/213082859.pdf
Akinsulorea, A. (2020). The Nigeria police philosophy and administration of criminal justice post 2015: Interrogating the dissonance. Sriwijaya Law Review, 4(2), 136-153. https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/432
Ali, S. (2020). Fighting financial crime: failure is not an option. Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2019-0050
Allioui, S. (2022). How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning? International Journal for Court Administration. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.396
Arief, B. N. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Perkembangan Penyusunan KUHP Baru. Kencana, Jakarta.
Aristeus, S. (2020). Eksekusi Ideal Perkara Perdata Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan Korelasinya Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.379-390
Bhatty, I. (2016). Navigating paroline’s wake. UCLA Law Review.
Brun, J.-P., Sotiropoulou, A., Gray, L., & Scott, C. (2021). Asset Recovery Handbook: A Guide for Practitioners, Second Edition. In StAR Initiative Ser.
Cassella, S. D. (2019). Nature and basic problems of nonconviction- based confiscation in the United States. Veredas Do Direito. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v16i34.1334
Chistyakova, Y., Wall, D. S., & Bonino, S. (2021). The Back- Door Governance of Crime: Confiscating Criminal Assets in the UK. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09423-5
Cross, C. (2016). “They’re very lonely”: Understanding the fraud victimisation of seniors. In International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i4.268
De Londras, F., & Dzehtsiarou, K. (2017). Mission Impossible? Addressing Non-Execution Through Infringement Proceedings in The European Court of Human Rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly . https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058931700001X
Deb, S., & Sengupta, S. (2020). What makes the base of the pyramid susceptible to investment fraud. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2019-0035
Dewi, K. R., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Novianto, W. T. (2018). Follow the Money as an Attempt of State Financial Loss Restoration in Criminal Action of Money Laundering with Corruption as Predicate Crime. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.403
Dietrich Hill, T. (2013). The arithmetic of justice: Calculating restitution for mortgage fraud. Columbia Law Review, 113(11), 1939-1976. https://columbialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Hill.pdf
Díez, C. G. J., & Herlin-Karnell, E. (2018). Prosecuting EU Financial Crimes: The European Public Prosecutor’s Office in Comparison to the US Federal Regime. German Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200023002
Doig, A. (2013). What is fraud? In Fraud (pp. 37-59). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843926115-9
Duyne, P. C. van, Zanger, W. de, & Kristen, F. (2014). Greedy of Crime-Money. The Reality and Ethics of Asset Recovery. In Corruption, Greed and Crime-money. Sleaze and shady economy in Europe and beyond (pp. 235-266). Wolf Legal Publishers. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2474113
Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). Analysis Of The Implementation Of The Non-Conviction-Based Concept In The Practice Of Asset Recovery Of Money Laundering Criminal Act In Indonesia From The Perspective Of Presumption Of Innocence. Jurnal Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i1.13961
Febby Mutiara, N., & Santoso, T. (2021). Principle of Simple, Speedy, and Low-Cost Trial and The Problem of Asset Recovery in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 11(2), 117-135.
Firmansyah, Y., Imam Haryanto, Tubagus Andri Purnama, & Edwin Destra. (2022). Compensation for Fraud (Gambling) Operations Under The Guise of Investment - Restitution as A Complex or Easy Way Out Mechanism? (Learning From Various Restitution And Law Cases In Indonesia). East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v1i3.280
Gaines, L. K., & Miller, R. L. (2016). Criminal Justice in Action: The Core (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://faculty.cengage.com/works/9781337092142
Green, S. T., Kondor, K., & Kidd, A. (2020). Story-telling as memorialisation: Suffering, resilience and victim identities. Onati Socio-Legal Series. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1122
Hamzah, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Edisi Kedua. In Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hartati, R., & Syafrida, S. (2021). HAMBATAN DALAM EKSEKUSI PERKARA PERDATA. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v12i1.1919
Hochstetler, A. (2001). Reporting of executions in U.S. newspapers. Journal of Crime and Justice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2001.9721614
Hurwitz, M. H. (2019). Focusing on deterrence to combat financial fraud and protect investors. Business Lawyer.
Junqueira, G. M. (2020). The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.294
Kaniki, A. O. J. (2021). The Role of Criminal Investigation in Facilitating Asset Recovery in Economic Crime in Tanzania. Eastern Africa Law Review. https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v48i1.5
Korejo, M. S., Rajamanickam, R., Md. Said, M. H., & Korejo, E. N. (2023). Plea bargain dilemma, financial crime and asset recovery. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(3), 628-639. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2022-0009
Lacey, D., Goode, S., Pawada, J., & Gibson, D. (2020). The application of scam compliance models to investment fraud offending. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 6(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-12-2019-0073
Lambert-Abdelgawad, E. (2002). The Execution of Judgments of The European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Pub_coe_HFfiles_2002_19_ENG
Lara, F. J. P. (2020). Asset recovery law in Mexico: Revision of its constitutional and conventional structure. In Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.351
Lehtonen, O., & Sutela, M. (2022). Geospatial Research Supporting Decision-Making in Court Services - an Assessment of the 2019 District Court Reform in Finland. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.385
Ling, L. M., & Xinying, C. (2021). The Asset Tracing and Recovery Review: Singapore. In R. Hunter (Ed.), The Laws Review (9th ed., pp. 278-295). Law Business Research Ltd. https://assets.ctfassets.net/wwqh0hdhnyw9/7EVeTD97XiOfBT6j8p1Q6r/ddc6de967d98064bb024b7b1177e2f97/Liechtenstein.pdf
Linn, C. J. (2007). What asset forfeiture teaches us about providing restitution in fraud cases. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 10(3), 215-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/13685200710763452
Lupianto, E. N. (2022). Asset Recovery for Victims of “Binary Option” Case in Review of International Criminal Law. Corruptio, 3(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v3i1.2640
Mahkamah Agung. (2022). Andika Surachman et al Case (First Travel). Direktori Putusan. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedff611463b25899ea313031333133.html
Mahkamah Agung. (2023). Indra Kenz Case (Binomo). Direktori Putusan. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaed91961c11dd56b545313635353432.html
Malsch, M., & Carrière, R. (1999). Victims’ wishes for compensation: The immaterial aspect. Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00062-2
Maroni, M. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Eksistensi Hakim Pengawas Dan Pengamat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v1no2.671
Mather, L. (2021). What is a “case”? Onati Socio-Legal Series. https://doi.org/10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1149
Nataraj-Hansen, S. (2024). “More intelligent, less emotive and more greedy”: Hierarchies of blame in online fraud. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100652
Novokmet, A. (2016). The right of a victim to a review of a decision not to prosecute as set out in article 11 of directive 2012/29/eu and an assessment of its transposition in Germany, Italy, France and Croatia. Utrecht Law Review. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.330
Nugroho, I. (2021). Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah melalui Gugatan Sederhana. Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum Dan Filantropi, 3(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.22515/alhakim.v3i1.3896
Panggabean, H., Simanjuntak, F., & Rajagukguk, H. (2024). Legal Review of the Role Supervisory Judges and Observer towards Convicts Who is Sentenced to Conditional Punishment. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.92.2
Parlindungan S, G. T. (2018). Pelaksanaan Lelang Barang Sitaan Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum. https://doi.org/10.36441/supremasi.v1i1.156
Pavlidis, G. (2023). Global sanctions against corruption and asset recovery: a European approach. Journal of Money Laundering Control. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-10-2021-0120
Pengadilan Negeri Sumber. (2017). Decision No. 193/ Pid.B/2017/PN Sbr. Sistem Infomrasi Penelusuran Perkara. https://sipp.pn-sumber.go.id/
Prabowo, H. Y. (2024). When gullibility becomes us: exploring the cultural roots of Indonesians’ susceptibility to investment fraud. Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2022-0271
Putri, A. S., Danil, E., & Mulyati, N. (2023). Legal Protection Application of Victims Through a Combined Lawsuit for Compensation in Case of Criminal Acts of Fraud and Money Laundering (Case Study: PT First Travel Cassation Decision Number 3096 K/Pid. Sus/2018). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(4), 398-405. https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/4533
Qisa’i, A. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) And Challenges Of Policy Reform On Asset Recovery In Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol17.2.785
Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu Hukum. In PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ramos, V. C., & Pereira Coelho, D. (2023). Defending victims of cross-border fraud in the EU - A Portuguese view, including the use of preventive “freezing” of bank accounts under anti-money laundering legislation. New Journal of European Criminal Law. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231173913
Sakellaraki, A. (2022). EU Asset Recovery and Confiscation Regime - Quo Vadis? A First Assessment of the Commission’s Proposal to Further Harmonise the EU Asset Recovery and Confiscation Laws. A Step in the Right Direction? New Journal of European Criminal Law, 13(4), 478-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844221139577
Sasanti, D. N., & Indah, H. T. K. (2022). Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Pajak Dalam Rangka Perwujudan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan. Reformasi Hukum, 26(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v26i1.256
Sittlington, S., & Harvey, J. (2018). Prevention of money laundering and the role of asset recovery. Crime, Law and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-018-9773-z
Suud, A. K. (2020). Optimization of The Role of Asset Recovery Center (PPA) of The Attorney-General’s Office of The Republic of Indonesia in Asset Recovery of Corruption Crime Results. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.211-231
Suxberger, A. H. G., & Pasiani, R. P. R. (2018). The role of financial intelligence in the persecution of money laundering and related felonies. Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas. https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v8i1.4618
Tasdikin, Y. L., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2022). Problems of The Settlement of State Looted Goods in The Criminal Act of Corruption and Money Laundering at PT Asuransi Jiwasraya. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v1i10.186
Taufiq, A. I. (2016). Pelaksanaan Tugas Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta bagi Narapidana Penjara di Lapas Wirogunan dan Lapas Narkotika. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum.
The World Bank. (2006). Doing Business in 2006: Creating Job. https://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual-Reports/English/DB06-FullReport.pdf
Thomas, J., Rasmussen, D. W., & Benson, B. L. (1995). The Economic Anatomy of a Drug War: Criminal Justice in the Commons. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235169
Timoera, D. A. (2018). Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Hakim Wasmat Terkait Perlindungan Hak-Hak Narapidana Dalam Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 14(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v14i1.6506
Van Ness, D. W., & Strong, K. H. (2015). 1 - Visions and Patterns: How Patterns of Thinking Can Obstruct Justice. Restoring Justice. Wibowo, A. (2023). Barriers and solutions to cross-border asset recovery. Journal of Money Laundering Control. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2022-0022
Zolkaflil, S., Syed Mustapha Nazri, S. N. F., & Omar, N. (2023). Asset recovery practices in combating money laundering: evidence from FATF mutual evaluation report of FATF member countries of Asia pacific region. Journal of Money Laundering Control. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2021-0127
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Criminalidad
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Licencia creative commons CC BY NC ND https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
