Take it Down Act: un análisis crítico de su rol contra la difusión no consentida de imágenes y deepfakes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47741/17943108.729Palabras clave:
Take it Down Act, deepfakes, violencia digital, inteligencia artificial, difusión no consentida de imágenesResumen
El presente artículo tiene por objetivo analizar de manera crítica los mecanismos clave, las fortalezas y los desafíos de la Take it Down Act, promulgada en Estados Unidos para combatir la proliferación de representaciones visuales íntimas no consentidas, incluyendo los deepfakes, y evaluar su equilibrio entre la protección de las víctimas y la salvaguarda de derechos fundamentales. Se empleó una metodología cualitativa, centrada en el análisis documental especializado. Esto incluyó un examen sistemático-lógico del texto íntegro de la ley y una revisión de la literatura académica y especializada para contextualizarla e identificar debates doctrinales y jurisprudenciales relevantes. Como resultados, se plantea que, si bien la Take it Down Act introduce avances significativos, en la práctica los mecanismos de la ley pueden generar tensiones con derechos fundamentales como la libertad de expresión y el debido proceso. Se identifican cargas operativas significativas para las plataformas, desafíos relacionados con la jurisdicción global de internet y la capacidad de supervisión de la Comisión Federal de Comercio. Por último, se concluye que, no obstante, su éxito a largo plazo y su aplicación equitativa dependerán de una implementación cuidadosa, una supervisión diligente por parte de la Comisión Federal de Comercio y una disposición a la adaptación continua frente a la evolución tecnológica y los desafíos interpretativos.
Descargas
Referencias
Barkauskaitė, J. (2024). Interplay between image-based sexual abuse, consent and online disinhibition effect in the Lithuanian context [tesis doctoral, Kauno Technologijos Universitetas]. https://epubl.ktu.edu/object/elaba:199534553/index.html
Batool, A., Naseem, M. y Toyama, K. (2024). Expanding concepts of non-consensual image-disclosure abuse: A study of NCIDA in Pakistan. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642220
Brown, A. J. (2024). Non-consensual intimate image sharing on the internet: Regulating betrayal in Jamaica and India. In Athique, A., Leong, S. y Varma, K. C. P. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of everyday digital life (pp. 187-202). Springer International Publishing.
Caldera, E. (2019). Reject the evidence of your eyes and ears: Deepfakes and the law of virtual replicants. Seton Hall Law Review, 50(1), 177-208. https://scholarship.shu.edu/shlr/vol50/iss1/5/
Ciusa, F. y Vargas-Chaves, I. (2013). Considerazioni critiche nella dottrina giuridica italiana sul Digital Rights Management. Principia Iuris, 19(1), 325-340. http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/779
Cohen, G. (2023). Digital purgatory and the rights of the dead: Protecting against digital disinterment in the age of artificial intelligence. Cardozo Law Review, 121. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4620092
De Carvalho Leal, V., Teixeira-Esteves, J., Montesinos-Padilha, C., Vargas-Chaves, I. y Uscanga-Barradas, A. (2018). Conflitos e novos desafios do direito: Política, meio ambiente e novas tecnologias. Editora RTM / Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
Devadasan, V., Giridhar, A., Mohan, S., Dhawan, S. y Kakkar, J. (2022). Tackling the dissemination and redistribution of NCII [Preprint]. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4323626
Diab, R. (2025). Are sexual deepfakes a crime in Canada? [Preprint]. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5119141
Falduti, M. y Tessaris, S. (2022). On the use of chatbots to report non-consensual intimate images abuses: The legal expert perspective. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (pp. 96-102). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3524458.3558870
Franco, M., Gaggi, O. y Palazzi, C. E. (2024). Characterizing non-consensual intimate image abuse on Telegram groups and channels. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Open Challenges in Online Social Networks (pp. 26-32). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3683649.3683653
Hawkins, W., Russell, C. y Mittelstadt, B. (2025). Deepfakes on demand: The rise of accessible non-consensual deepfake image generators [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03859
Henry, N. y Beard, G. (2024). Image-based sexual abuse perpetration: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(5), 3981-3998. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241266137
Huber, A. R. y Ward, Z. (2025). Non-consensual intimate image distribution: Nature, removal, and implications for the Online Safety Act. European Journal of Criminology, 22(1), 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708241255821
Kakungulu-Mayambala, R., Solomon, R., Makmot, V. P. y Rutabingwa, D. (2021). The case for a law against the online distribution of non-consensual intimate images in Uganda. Stellenbosch Law Review, 32(1), 93-128. https://doi.org/10.47348/SLR/v32/i1a5
Karasavva, V. y Forth, A. (2022). Personality, attitudinal, and demographic predictors of non-consensual dissemination of intimate images. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21-22), NP19265-NP19289. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211043586
Karasavva, V., Swanek, J., Smodis, A. y Forth, A. (2023). From myth to reality: Sexual image abuse myth acceptance, the Dark Tetrad, and non-consensual intimate image dissemination proclivity. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 29(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2022.2032430
Keren-Paz, T. (2023a). Is suing viewers practicable? In Egalitarian digital privacy (pp. 214-223). Bristol University Press.
Keren-Paz, T. (2023b). The policy debate: Uniqueness of harm from NCII. In Egalitarian digital privacy (pp. 86-109). Bristol University Press.
Keren-Paz, T. (2023c). The power of property: Strict liability for viewing NCII. In Egalitarian digital privacy (pp. 175-193). Bristol University Press.
Keren-Paz, T. (2023d). Viewers’ liability: Intention and objective fault. In Egalitarian digital privacy (pp. 157-174). Bristol University Press.
Łabuz, M. (2023). Regulating deep fakes in the Artificial Intelligence Act. Applied Cybersecurity & Internet Governance, 2(1), 1-42. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/56661541.pdf
Langa, J. (2021). Deepfakes, real consequences: Crafting legislation to combat threats posed by deepfakes. Boston University Law Review, 101, 761-806. https://www.bu.edu/bulawreview/files/2021/04/LANGA.pdf
Loewenstein, S. (2024). Make America Fake again?: Banning deepfakes of federal candidates in political advertisements under the First Amendment. Fordham Law Review, 93(1), 273-322. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol93/iss1/7/
Maddocks, S. (2018). From non-consensual pornography to image-based sexual abuse: Charting the course of a problem with many names. Australian Feminist Studies, 33(97), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2018.1542592
Mania, K. (2024). Legal protection of revenge and deepfake porn victims in the European Union: Findings from a comparative legal study. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221143772
Penney, J. W. (2015). Chilling effects in the internet age: Three case studies (PhD thesis, University of Oxford). https://tinyurl.com/oxforduniv2015
Qiwei, L., Zhang, S., Kasper, A. T., Ashkinaze, J., Eaton, A. A., Schoenebeck, S. y Gilbert, E. (2024a). Reporting non-consensual intimate media: An audit study of deepfakes [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12138
Qiwei, L., Zhang, S., Pratt, S. P., Kasper, A. T., Gilbert, E. y Schoenebeck, S. (2024b). A law of one’s own: The inefficacy of the DMCA for non-consensual intimate media [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13575
Raihana, S. N., Arifin, M. y Aryati, V. (2025). Addressing revenge porn through Islamic ethics and cyber ethics: An analysis from a Fiqh Sunnah perspective. Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, 8(1), 1030-1046. https://doi.org/10.5281/al-afkar.v8i1.1689
Semenzin, S. y Bainotti, L. (2020). The use of Telegram for non-consensual dissemination of intimate images: Gendered affordances and the construction of masculinities. Social Media + Society, 6(4), Article 2056305120984453. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984453
Shechory Bitton, M., Zvi, L. y Shamir-Peled, N. (2024). Examining perceptions of blame and homophobia: The impact of sexual orientation on non-consensual intimate image dissemination. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2362773
Shirish, A. y Komal, S. (2024). A socio-legal inquiry on deepfakes. California Western International Law Journal, 54(2), Article 6. https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwilj/vol54/iss2/6/
Slaughter, R. K., Kopec, J. y Batal, M. (2020). Algorithms and economic justice: A taxonomy of harms and a path forward for the federal trade commission. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 23(Special Issue), 1-84. https://yjolt.org/sites/default/files/23_yale_j.l._tech._special_issue_1.pdf
Ugwuoke, V. y Sanfilippo, M. R. (2025). The current landscape of deepfake legislation in the United States: Analysis of state-level responses. Journal of Information Policy, 15. https://tinyurl.com/citedrive2025
Umbach, R., Henry, N. y Beard, G. (2025). Prevalence and impacts of image-based sexual abuse victimization: A multinational study. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-20). Association for Computing Machinery.
United States of America, The Senate of the United States. (2023). Tools to address known exploitation by immobilizing technological deepfakes on websites and networks act [Take it Down Act]. 118º Cong., 1ª Ses.
Valente, M. (2018, 17 de junio). Do we need new laws to address non-consensual circulation of intimate images: The case of Brazil. GenderIT. https://tinyurl.com/genderit2018
Van den Eynde, S. (2024, 11-14 de septiembre). Non-consensual dissemination of intimate images: Impact on victims and their willingness to report [presentación de ponencia]. 24th Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology, Bucarest, Rumania.
Vargas-Chaves I. (2016). The ISP’s role in improving intellectual property protection on the digital economy. In Vestigium Ire, 10(1), 112-117. http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ivestigium/article/view/1183
Vargas-Chaves, I. (2017). Infracciones a la propiedad intelectual y a la reputación en internet en la jurisprudencia norteamericana durante la década de los noventa. Principia Iuris, 14(27), 232-251. http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1409
World Economic Forum. (2003). ¿Cómo combatir el preocupante aumento del uso de deepfakes en la ciberdelincuencia? https://tinyurl.com/weforum2003
Yadav, V. (2023). Tackling non-consensual dissemination of intimate images in India’s contemporary legal framework. International Annals of Criminology, 61(3-4), 355-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2023.15
Zvi, L. y Bitton, M. S. (2021). Perceptions of victim and offender culpability in non-consensual distribution of intimate images. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(5), 427-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1818236
Zvi, L. y Shechory-Bitton, M. (2020). Police officer perceptions of non-consensual dissemination of intimate images. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02148
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Criminalidad
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Licencia creative commons CC BY NC ND https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Cómo citar
