Medical and forensic aspects of performing a remote interrogation of persons with disabilities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47741/17943108.563

Keywords:

Investigator, victim, Remote interrogation, dementia, pretrial investigation, person with disabilities, ramp, witness

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop new proposals for improving criminal procedural legislation in the field of conducting remote investigative actions with disabled persons, taking into account their physiological and functional characteristics. Research material and methods: This study is based on an analysis of the norms regarding the criminal procedural legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and a number of foreign states that regulate the procedure for conducting remote investigative actions - as well as scientific publications on the research topic in the field of psychology and medicine. An integrated approach involves considering the studied phenomena of communication during an investigative action as a set of interconnected and interdependent elements, i.e., consideration of the issue from the medical, psychological and legal points of view. Situational and systemic types of analysis, complex sociological analysis, diagnostics and forecasting investigative situation were also used. Methods of analysis and synthesis, induction, deduction, methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis were employed to clarify the legal essence of the studied phenomenon. Findings: practical recommendations aimed at improving and developing the performance of remote investigative actions involving persons with disabilities (further – FWDs) y creating optimal conditions for the transfer of verbal, medical, and psychological information, as well as technical and forensic support for conducting RIAs. The following conclusions were made: in order to improve the current legislation, it is advisable to consider the issue of developing and including a special norm in the legislation, taking into account the characteristics of the communicative competencies of persons with disabilities. This norm regulates the procedure for conducting investigative actions involving the mute, deaf, blind and other persons with disabilities. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleksandrov, A. A. (2002). Problems of Integrative Psychotherapy / A.A. Alexandrov // Psychology and Psychotherapy. SPb., 2002. P. 17.

Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2014). Código de Procedimiento Penal de la República de Belarús. No. 231-V (with the latest amendments and additions dated February 1, 2021) https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=31575852

Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Belarus. (1999). Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Belarus. No. 2953. https://etalonline.by/document/?regnum=hk9900295

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2006). Adopted by the Resolution 61/106 of General Assembly on December 13, 2006. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/disability.shtml

Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons. (1975). Adopted by the Resolution 3447 (XXX) at the 2433rd plenary meeting of the UN General Assembly on December 9, 1975. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declarationrights-disabled-persons

Dospulov G. G. (1996). Psychology of interrogation in criminal proceedings. P. 224.

Khan, A. A., Shaikh, A. A. & Laghari, A. A. (2023). IoT with Multimedia Investigation: A Secure Process of Digital Forensics Chain-of-Custody using Blockchain Hyperledger Sawtooth. Arab J Sci Eng 48, 10173–10188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07555-1

Martynov. A. N., Kravets, E. G. & Shuvalov, N. V. (2017). Organizational and tactical module of remote investigative actions // Criminological problems of law enforcement: Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the MIA of Russia. 2017. No. 4 (44). pp. 128-129.

Program “Digital Kazakhstan” (2017). Ministry of Digital Development, Innovation and Aerospace Industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan. https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/mdai/activities/14764?lang=ru

The Standard Rules on the Equalisation of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities (1993). The Standard Rules on the Equalisation of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities (adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 20, 1993) https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/disabled.shtml

Vasiliev, V. A. (1967). Some aspects of the psychology of interrogation. Criminalistics in the service of the investigation. Vilnius. 1967. p. 140.

World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons. (1982). Adopted by the Resolution 37/52 of General Assembly on December 3, 1982. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/prog.shtml

World Health Organization. (2019). World report on vision. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/328717.World Health Organization.

World Health Organization, (2022). Ensuring the rights of participants with disabilities in criminal proceedings: a compensatory approach. Materials of the International scientific-practical conference. Krasnoyarsk, 2021. p. 201. ICD-11.

World Health Organization and World Bank. (2011). World Report on Disability. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated April 13, 2005 “On the social protection of persons with disabilities in the Republic of Kazakhstan”; Order of the Minister of Health and Social Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated January 30, 2015 No. 44

Downloads

Published

2024-04-19

How to Cite

Badanova, A. N., Begaliyev, Y. N., Lyssenko, V. Y., Kurmangali, Z. K., & Zauresh N., A. (2024). Medical and forensic aspects of performing a remote interrogation of persons with disabilities. Revista Criminalidad, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.47741/17943108.563

Issue

Section

Criminological studies