Propriedades psicométricas do ERASOR 2.0 em adolescentes chilenos com práticas sexuais abusivas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47741/17943108.289Palavras-chave:
Adolescentes, agressores sexuais, avaliação de risco, previsão de reincidência, tratamentoResumo
Objetivo: Explorar as propriedades psicométricas do instrumento ERASOR 2.0 em uma amostra de adolescentes chilenos que cometeram práticas sexuais abusivas. Método: Por meio de um desenho instrumental, foram analisados os prontuários de 196 adolescentes do sexo masculino, entre 12 e 18 anos, de seis regiões do país. Resultados: Com base em critérios externos extraídos dos instrumentos MACI e CACSA, identificam-se propriedades psicométricas aceitáveis de análise de confiabilidade (Alfa do Cronbach 0,75), confiabilidade interobservador (kappa de Fleiss 0.67) e validade concorrente. Discussão: O presente estudo se destaca por ser a primeira exploração psicométrica do instrumento na América Latina, no qual são relatadas evidências adequadas de confiabilidade e validade que apoia seu uso em programas de tratamento e contextos jurídicoforenses no Chile.
Downloads
Referências
Alarcón, P., Pérez-Luco, R., Salvo, S., Roa, G., Jaramillo, K. & Sanhueza, C. (2010). Validación del cuestionario de auto-reporte de comportamiento antisocial en adolescentes. CACSA. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 20(47), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103863X2010000300002
Andrés-Pueyo, A. & Redondo, S. (2007). Predicción de la violencia: entre la peligrosidad y la valoración del riesgo de violencia. Papeles del Psicólogo, 28, 157-173.
Barra, S., Bessler, C., Landolt, M. & Aebi, M. (2018). Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth. Psychological Assessment, 30(11), 1430-1443. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000590
Chu, C., Ng, K., Fong, J. & Teoh, J. (2012). Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and the YLS/CMI in a non-western context. Sexual Abuse: a Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(2), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211404250
De Vries, M., Mann, R., Maruna, S. & Thornton, D. (2015). An Exploration of Protective Factors Supporting Desistance from Sexual Offending. Sexual Abuse: a Journal of Research and Treatment, 2015, 27(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214547582
Epperson, D. & Ralston, C. (2015). Development and validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment ToolII (JSORRAT-II). Sexual Abuse: a Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(6), 529-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213514452
Epperson, D., Ralston, C., Fowers, D., DeWitt, J. & Gore, K. (2006). Actuarial risk assessment with juveniles who sexually offend: Development of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II (JSORRAT-II). En D. Prescott, Risk assessment of youth who have sexually abused (págs. 118-169). Wood N' Barnes.
Horcajo-Gil, P. J., Dujo, V., Andreu, J., & Marín, M. (2019). Valoración y gestión del riesgo de reincidencia delictiva en menores infractores: una revisión de instrumentos. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 29, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2018a15
McCann, K. & Lussier, P. (2008). Antisociality, sexual deviance, and sexual reoffending in juvenile sex offenders: a meta-analytical investigation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204008320260
McCoy, W. (2007). Predicting treatment outcome and recidivism among juvenile sex offenders: the utility of the J-SOAP-II and ERASOR in an outpatient treatment program. Sam Houston State University. Millon, T. (1993). Manual of Million Adolescent Clinical Inventory. National Computer Systems.
Prentky, R. & Righthand, S. (2003). Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol II (J-SOAP-II) manual. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1037/e377042004-001
Rajlic, G. & Gretton, H. (2010). An examination of two sexual recidivism risk measures in adolescent offenders: the moderating effect of offender type. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1066-1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810376354
Ralston, C., Epperson, D. & Edwards, S. (2016). Cross-validation of the JSORRAT-II in Iowa. Sexual Abuse: a Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(6), 534 -554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214548074
Rasmussen, L. (2018). Comparing predictive validity of JSORRAT-II and MEGA with sexually abusive youth in long-term residential custody. International Journal of Offender Rehabilitation and Comparative Criminology, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17726550
Salazar, M., Álvarez, L., & Pérez, R. (2016). Instrumentos para la valoración del riesgo de violencia sexual en ofensores sexuales adolescentes: evidencias de validez en países de América Latina. Revista Criminalidad, 58(3), 87-99.
Singh, J., Condemarín, C. & Folino, J. (2013). El uso de instrumentos de evaluación de riesgo de violencia en Argentina y Chile. Revista Criminalidad, 55(3), 279-290.
Venegas, R. (2009). Centro Trafún. Programa de Prevención de Riesgo de Reincidencia Sexual para niños/as y adolescentes. El Observador, 4, 71-88.
Venegas, R., Sánchez, N., Hilterman, E. & Siria, S. (2013). Estimate of risk of adolescent sexual offender recidivism (ERASOR). Versión 2.0, traducción y adaptación al español. Manuscrito inédito.
Viljoen, J., Elkovitch, N., Scalora, M., & Ullman, D. (2009). Assessment of reoffense risk in adolescents who have committed sexual offenses: predictive validity of the ERASOR, PCL: YV, YLS/CMI, and Static-99. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 981-1000.
Viljoen, J., Mordell, S., & Beneteau, J. (2012). Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: a meta-analysis of the J- SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093938
Vinet, E. & Forns, M. (2008). Normas chilenas para el MACI: una integración de criterios categoriales y dimensionales. Terapia Psicológica, 26(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082008000200001
Wenger, L. & Andres-Pueyo, A. (2016). Test forenses en español para evaluar adolescentes infractores. Papeles del Psicólogo, 37(2), 107-117.
Worling, J. (2004) The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism: preliminary psychometric data. Sexual Abuse: a Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(3), 235-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600305
Worling, J. (2006) Coding Examples for The "ERASOR". The Sexual Abuse: Family Education & Treatment (SAFE-T) Program. Thistletown Regional Centre for Children & Adolescents, Ontario Ministry of Children & Youth Services.
Worling, J. (2013) Desistence for adolescents who sexually harm DASH-13 (Unpublished document). http://www.drjamesworling.com/uploads/8/7/7/6/8776493/dash-13.pdf
Worling, J. (2017) Protective + Risk Observations for Eliminating Sexual Offense Recidivism PROFESOR (unpublished document). https://www.profesor.ca/
Worling, J. & Curwen, T. (2000) Estimate of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (The ERASOR) (Version 1.2). Unpublished manuscript. Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. https://doi.org/10.1037/t04170-000
Worling, J. & Curwen, T. (2001) Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism, Version 2.0. Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. https://doi.org/10.1037/t04170-000
Worling, J. & Langton, C. (2015). A Prospective Investigation of Factors that Predict Desistance from Recidivism for Adolescents who have Sexually Offended. Sexual Abuse: a Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 127- 142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214549260
Worling, J., Bookalam, D., & Litteljohn, A. (2012). Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR). Sexual Abuse: a Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(3), 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211407080
Zeng, G., Chu, C., & Lee, Y. (2015). Assessing Protective Factors of Youth Who Sexually Offended in Singapore: Preliminary Evidence on the Utility of the DASH-13 and the RIESGO DE REINCIDENCIA EN OFENSOR SEXUAL ADOLESCENTE 89 SAPROF. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1) , 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906321456168
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Licencia creative commons CC BY NC ND https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
